FreshHumanFish

Not too long ago I've uncovered the backbone of a numerical pattern. I don't think anyone has ever uncovered this before. The reason why I think this is because it would be enormously time-consuming to do it without a computer (which leaves us with only the last few decades, maybe just one century to round it off, in which someone else could have made the same conclusion) and because I doubt there are a lot of people interested in trying to find numerical patterns (although the truth is still to be seen on this presumption and might surprise me). In this journal entry I want to try and explain what I've uncovered for anyone else that's sligh

Inspired by Vedic-Tantra's One-over-19 Magic Square and fueled with the bits of knowledge I've gained about working with excel, I've set out and made an excel file that maps the decimals of quotients. In this file, the base numbers (or root numbers) have a color assigned to them so that patterns may become visible. If you would set up the divisions as fractions then the numerator (the number on top of the fraction bar) increases with one for each row you go down. The number under the fraction bar, the denominator, is for all fractions the same because this is the number for which we are searching a pattern. The picture below shows the result

When I thought about the phrase "senseless violence" earlier today, it daunted onto me that the phrase itself implies there is a type of violence that's not senseless. When I shared this thought with the person that coined the senseless violence phrase to me he agreed with the thought that if you have a (good) reason for which you need violence it can be considered as being "not senseless". When does a violent act not have a reason for being committed? When can such reason be considered a "good reason"? I won't claim I understand (human) behavior well enough to know every aspect that moves an organism. My (following) opinion is built upon